Ponderings of a Scientist

moderately useless musings on the World as I see it

Democratic Debate

Category: Politics            Monday, June 4, 2007 at 11:22 am

So Zipy and I spent about 30 minutes last night watching the democratic debate (part of the first hour with moderator questions, not the second hour with audience questions) before we decided the Yankees - Red Sox game was more important.  These are my thoughts from the debate:

1.  How interesting how they arraigned the candidates by chance of winning the candidacy - A guy I never heard of on one end (Mike Gravel former Senator for Alaska - the republican plant according to Zipy - and given his answers to the questions this is quite possible) and Dennis Kucinich on the other end (such a good guy, he will get lots of votes in NH with the morally conscience voter (think those people that voted for Dean), but has no chance nationally - he is too idealistic and doesn’t play politics enough), next tier in Bidden, Richardson, and Dodd and then the big three in the middle - Obama, Clinton, Edwards.

2.  Gravel - an ass: Kucinich - great ideas, will never work with our current political system and he is too soft spoken, he got over shadowed by the other candidates: Richardson - confusing, didn’t answer questions: Dodd - trying to stand on his laurels from CT: Bidden - didn’t hear much from him: Edwards and Obama: They spent the whole night kissing each others butt ” Well moderator I have to give props to Obama for what he said..”  ” Well moderator I thank John for his comment and I agree with everything he says but I will do it better….”: Clinton - everything was ANTI - BUSH, which might be a good approach to target the independent voter if she becomes the democratic candidate, but this was a democratic debate - essentially she was talking to democrats, who are by nature anti- GW.  She needed to tell us how she is different/better than the rest of the candidates.

3.  All and all it was a very respectful debate ( the part I watched) - no talking over each other and tons of props given to other candidates.  They did a better job of projecting a unified democratic front than representing their individual ideas, especially the big three.
Any one else have a take on it?

Comment by nikkiana

June 4, 2007 @ 12:34 pm

We watched the second half (my mother didn’t think to IM me and tell me it was on until then… ).

What amused me most is that for the majority of what I watched, Bill Clinton suddenly didn’t have a name. He became “her husband” (or in the case of Hilary, “my husband”).

I kept forgetting who Gravel, Bidden and Dodd were… Richardson didn’t say much impressive, other than something about all day kindergarten ought to be mandatory which rubbed me the wrong way. Edwards didn’t get to talk much. Kucinich, as you said, had great ideas but they lack a certain sort of realism. Hilary seemed to spend more time talking about her husband than what she was going to do, and Obama got me to look up from the Scrabble board every time he talked, but I can’t for the life of me remember what he said.

There was a lot more talking over each other in the second half… but I blame that more on moderation, it was often unclear who was supposed to respond first.

Comment by Z.Monkey

June 4, 2007 @ 1:41 pm

Much of the questioning in the debate was leading, which, I suppose, it is supposed to be. But questions like, “By a show of hands, who believes that English should be the official language?” Are specifically designed to be talking points for Republican analysts, who will ignore the comments Hilary made about why she voted against the measure (i.e. making it official and not just national forces “all” government documents to be in the language, takes away “all” money for multi-lingual services at hospitals and other civic programs such as child services). I applaud Obama for attacking that sort of question, but I bet you $10 that the question will be used by the republicans in the actual elections to show how “Unamerican” the democratic candidate is.

On another note I thought the following observation was quite good:

I don’t know why she just can’t say about her war authorization vote: “I regret that vote. It was a mistake.” Edwards did so and it hasn’t hurt him. In fact, given our current president’s inability to admit a mistake, being honest about the biggest whiffs is kind of refreshing. But Hillary is learning the worst lessons from Bush. And thus, rather than admit she screwed up, she’s reduced to arguing that she placed all her trust on Bush.

In my book, saying “I made a mistake” will always trump “I trusted Bush.”

Also, I do agree that there is something about the way Obama speaks that is attention grabbing. I think its more style than substance; that’s not saying the substance is bad.

Comment by Z.Monkey

June 4, 2007 @ 1:43 pm

Ha. Poor use of blockquotes. That last paragraph wasn’t supposed to be in a blockquote.

Comment by tizzom

June 6, 2007 @ 10:31 am

I think the debate was good, overall. they seemed to have a unified agenda of getting the democrats on the same page - away from republicans.

I agree with comments that Hillary was pushing the anti-Bush thing and i too was peeved at the arrangement of the candidates on stage. maybe alphabetical order would be more appropriate. it’s subtle ways like this that the media controls who’s in and who’s out. also, at one point obama, clinton, and edwards had spoken 2 times each consecutively. then when it was graves’ turn blitzer pre-empted him with a ‘keep this really short’ type of comment. it was bullsh1t.

I was impressed by Kucinich’s speak although i think he should have spoken more - especially about his plan for single payer universal health care and how it’s time people stop making excessive amounts of money over denying/granting health care.

i like that obama calls out problems with the questions. i don’t like how there are no follow up questions to issues of campaign finance reform which is one of the most important first steps for fixing our dysfunctional democracy.

:endrant:

tom

Comment by The Scientist

June 6, 2007 @ 12:30 pm

Hey Tom are you back in the States? We are having a bit of a get together - Beer Tasting, BBQ, baby watching at our house on the afternoon of June 16th if your interested.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>