Ponderings of a Scientist

moderately useless musings on the World as I see it

I need a belt

Category: Rants            Tuesday, June 20, 2006 at 1:01 pm

Just a brief rant on women’s clothing sizes (for my limited
female readership and empathic male readership) while I await some paperwork
from my supervisor. I have two major
complaints:

First and foremost, why the arbitrary number system? It reminds me of the new initiative in
elementary schools to not give out grades or rankings so that no child’s
feelings are hurt. Well if my kid is bad
at math or soccer or playing with other kids I and she need to know about
it. Raising a generation that has high
self esteem but no responsibility for their actions is not getting us anywhere
(but that’s a whole other post). What I’m
trying to say to clothing manufacturers is stop sparing my self esteem with
your silly number system and while your at it start making cloths with more
lengths options! What a novel idea to
have pants fitted to your waist and length measurements, oh wait, men’s
clothing has been that way for decades!!

Second, if you insist on keeping your number system decide
on either odd numbers, even numbers or all numbers and then make the sizes standard. I should wear the same size no matter what
store I shop in or what style I try on.
However, before different manufacturers can sync their sizes the
individual companies themselves have to be consistent. I have a pair of khakis on today that I
ordered online from a company I often shop at, so logic says I would know what
size I where at the store and safely be able to purchase without trying on,
WRONG! They are too big, yet my pair of jeans
of the same size and same brand are a bit tight! Ah, annoyance……

I'll volunteer to wear Brazilian lederhosen

Category: Rants, Politics, Ponderings            Monday, June 19, 2006 at 11:13 pm

Three comments related only in the temporal sense in that all were
brought to my attention today. From most funny to least:

So apparently if Adidas sponsors the World Cup and you and 1000 of your
closest friends decide to go the stadium in Nike’s, your shoes will be
confiscated and you will have to trudge through the beer and popcorn
soaked floor in your stockinged feet. Or at least you should
following FIFA’s logic: a large group of Dutch soccer fans
arrived at the World Cup match between the Netherlands and the Ivory
Coast in orange lederhosen which they had purchased in a Dutch grocery
market. Problem was the lederhosen were created by Bavaria, a
Dutch beer brewery, and since Bavaria is not a sponsor of the Dutch
World Cup team or the World Cup Tournee itself (Budweiser is the brew
of choice - arghh how did cheap American beer get the sponsorship for
the largest tournament of a sport Americans don’t even call by its
appropriate name!) all of the fans were told to ditch the pants or
leave. So 1000 Dutch fans watched the game in their undies and
then walked back to their hotels in their undies as the lederhosen were
confiscated not just held for the game by the FIFA officials. On
a similar note I had a bag confiscated by the Fleet Center (Now the
Garden - again-) because the country went from yellow terror alert to orange
while I was on the way to the hockey game and apparently bags are
allowed during federal yellow terror alerts, but disallowed during any
higher level of alert. FIFA and the Fleet Center stole our stuff,
and I think I can speak for the Dutch when I say I want my orange
lederhosen back, er I mean my bag!!

The Comedy of Errs

So there is this woman at my work.
She is your classic North Boston townie; she’s got the accent and the
outfits to prove it. Any way I’ve said all of one word to her,
albeit everyday and that word is “hello”, while passing in the
hall. However, I know a lot about her life because she is a loud
mouth and is constantly gabbing to her friends in the office or on the
phone. The woman has the funniest luck, for instance: 1) A
few weeks ago she had a squirrel in her living room that refused to
leave and 2) yesterday she was hanging out at a friend’s pool relaxing
(and boy does she need it with all the drama in her life I also hear
about all the time) and she hears a big crash. Turns out some
legal immigrant, albeit with no license, is driving down the road,
hears that Brazil (she was Brazilian) won their World Cup match, takes
both hands off the wheel and broadsides my co-worker’s car which was
parked on the street. So the cops and tow truck come, the cops
arrest the Brazilian for not having a license and the tow truck driver
tows my co-worker’s car away, which is likely totaled because the axel
go pinched between the Brazilian woman’s car and the curb causing some
deformation. So as if it could get worse for this poor women, she
spends all of today on the phone with her insurance, the cops, the
rental car place, etc. and it turns out the owner of the other car (not
the driver) has 15 days to file a insurance claim and until then my
coworker can’t get money to rent a car. She is a single mom of a
21 year old and a 9 year old diabetic so she doesn’t exactly have the
money to fund the rental car on her own. Wow this story was
funnier in my head, its sort of depressing now. I think tomorrow
I will expand my relationship with this woman beyond “hello” and see if
she needs any help!

This is not what they “volunteered” for….

Volunteer: (v)

  1. To perform or offer to perform a service of one’s own free will.
  2. To do charitable or helpful work without pay: Many retirees volunteer in community service and day care centers. (excerpt from: Answers.com)

So according to our federal administration we currently have an all
volunteer military fighting the war. To our government I say
thank you for not instilling a draft; Canada is nice and all but I’m
beginning a career here and I’m glad it doesn’t have to be interupted by
fleeing the country. To the government I also say
your military is not “volunteer”. For the following reasons 1)
when you sign up to do one thing (as a volunteer) and you are forced to
do something else against your free will you are no longer volunteering
(i.e. National Guardsmen [notice the National part indicating guarding
our Nation the US on US soil] now fighting, on multiple tours, in the
middle east; 2) when your volunteer contract is up [think ROTC] and the
institution refuses to let you leave your position you are no longer
volunteering, you are now a endentured servant! I read an article today in the
“Federal Times” newspaper listing the new rules for getting out,
apparently the end date on your original contract is no longer valid,
for some reservists your resignation is only accepted if: 1) your
position is at least 80% staffed, 2) you have already served in Iraq, 3)
your doctor or pastor writes a note for you. If you don’t fit
into one of these categories you don’t get out. For full military
personnel (not reservist) there is this other rule that makes it even
harder to get out; I don’t remember what it is termed and I have to go
to hockey so I will have to leave it at that. If you think what
the government is doing is wrong, you should support Brad Schwan
and his lawsuit against the government accusing that he was twice
illegally denied the right to resign from the reserves at the end of
his 8 year obligatory term.

Biking and Kissing

Category: Ponderings            Monday, June 19, 2006 at 4:40 pm

So some guy decides to go on a 5 week bike trip in search of his 6th ever kiss. Along the way he blogs and creates podcasts of his memoir. I just listened to the prologue and its quite entertaining. Check out his blog. He is also going to be featured on NHPR’s “The Front Porch” tonight.

Verbal Diarrh… I think I needs some pepto bismol… "Heartburn, nausea, indigestion! Upset stomach, diarrhea! Hey! Pepto Bismol!"

Category: Rants, Politics            Thursday, June 15, 2006 at 12:41 am

So I’ve been thinking lately and I’ve come up with this. I hate
empty talk. I find it terribly annoying when people claim to have
one value (ethic/moral) system, but then don’t act on it. I mean
please, enough with the righteous indignation! Part of this
realization has been a personal evaluation and while I think I’m better
than average when it comes to practicing what I preach, I’m going to
work on it. I think my worst offense is complaining about
politics and not doing anything to change the social landscape around
me (besides voting - and I should really do that more, engage in local
politics, not just state and federal elections). I guess this is
because I don’t know where to start or what I can do. Any
thoughts?

I think society’s worst offense is complaining about gasoline prices,
yet not doing anything about our oil dependency. Really if your
driving an SUV 20 miles to work each day you have no right to whine
about gas prices. In fact you should be paying me for driving a
hybrid and walking as much as possible (besides the commute) While I
would love for everyone to value the
environment and be concerned about global warming and urban sprawl and
super powerful multinational oil firms and reduce their oil use for
those reasons, I understand this is a pipe dream. So stop driving
gas guzzlers because your selfish and don’t want to pay the fuel costs
or want to buy into the hybrid trend; I don’t care what your moral
grounds, as long as you stop driving the trucks, caravans, SUVs,
oversized sedans and overpowered sports cars

I have an idea for a campaign. I’m going to write
bumpsticker-esque comments and stick them in the window of my car while
I make my stupid commute each day (that reminds me for those of you
that care, looks like I got the new job, I going to revisit the place
next week and get the low-down on salary, benefits, hours etc. before
making a decision, but I’m their #1 choice.)

Some Ideas:

For Yuppy Mommies: If you really cared about your kids’ future you wouldn’t be driving that beast
For Ford F-150 Drivers: I don’t see anything in your bed, do you
really use that truck to haul things? You know you can rent a
truck from U-haul for less then you pay in gas for those times you really need it.
For the people that need the “family car”: Stop buying your kids
so much shit and stop forcing them into so many activities and you
won’t need all that space in your car
For the Motorcyclists: Good fuel economy, now put on a helmet and a muffler and your good to go!

Any other ideas?

Who killed <strike>Roger Rabbit</strike> the Electric Car

Category: Environment            Wednesday, June 14, 2006 at 5:13 pm

KP sent me this and I think others will find it useful so I’m upgrading
it from potental obscurity in the comment section and give it its very
own post.

Watch this if you hate paying high gas prices

Science News

Category: Sports, Ponderings            Sunday, June 11, 2006 at 1:33 pm

I was reading Science News magazine this morning and came across this.
It’s a series of tests developed at Harvard to examine your impliict
bais to a variety of topics. The article talks about the race
test so that is the one I took. I’m not sure if I buy the result;
I think they set it up in order to get that resut, but it still was
interesting.

On another note it was me that scored my first hockey goal last Monday
(i.e. Zipy’s blog). Sorry Tizzom not to have mentioned it
earlier. The Details: I was attempting to make a pass in front
of the net, but a defender got in the way. Luckily he was too
slow with his stick and the puck hit his skate and flew into the near
side of the net before the goalie even saw it.

Justice to Zarqawi

Category: Politics            Thursday, June 8, 2006 at 1:02 pm

More Presidental Rhetoric:

G.W. says, “Military forces…delivered justice to (Zarqawi)”
G.W. means ” Our soliders killed Zarqawi”

Lunch Time

Category: Politics, Environment            Wednesday, June 7, 2006 at 4:41 pm

A bit of lunch time food for thought:

1) The companies Timberland, Bank of America and Google now
give their employees cash incentives to purchase hybrids. If you work for Bank of America, within 90
miles of Boston ,you get $3000
extra in your paycheck when you buy a hybrid.

While I think this is GREAT, I do want to point out that the
term “hybrid” has morphed from “environmentally sound vehicle utilizing batteries
to minimize gasoline use, reduce emissions and increase mileage” to “anything
with an electronic engine component, possibly used for the above purpose, but
more likely used to 1) make SUVS more powerful while only slightly improving mileage
(say from 15 to 19 mpg) and 2) satisfy the desires of the public to be trendy
(read: have a hybrid) while still maintaining the yuppie, soccer mom appeal.

The short of it is: tax breaks, cash incentives, use of special
traffic lanes, all benefits given to hybrids, should instead be given based on
fuel efficiency/emissions not on hardware. It makes no sense for a Ford SUV hybrid to get
these benefits, while a standard Honda Civic or Accord or any other small,
ultra low emissions vehicle or a biodiesel vehicle is excluded.

2) I was listening to the radio show “Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy: Quandry
Phase” yesterday and I found this funny and TRUE (think cell phones with cameras/tvs/video
recorders/email devices/mp3 players):

“… Ford
uses these overly complex yet useless electronic devices, because of the joy he
fills when he actual gets it to work. He’s
so happy he neglects to realize the uselessness of the product. Essential the superficial defects of the
product mask the major defects…” (or something like that)

High Flying Trees

Category: Environment            Tuesday, June 6, 2006 at 5:20 pm

Green Roofs, who knew? Similar to the idea of planting trees in urban arees as waste water control (see my post “Give a Hoot; Don’t Pollute”), trees are now moving to commercial roofs. Turns out you can plant certain greenary on roofs, especially flat, gravel-based, commercial roofs. Why you might ask?

1. The vegetation absorbs water, reducing run-off and pollution transferred in run-off, and decreases the pressure on storm water systems

2. The vegetation asks as insulation, lowering heating and cooling costs in the building.

3. The vegetation protects the roofing system, reducing the need for maintenance and replacement.

As the gentlemen from Boston’s Environmental Services Office just stated on NPR; anything we can do to lessen our footprint on the Earth and the impact of our infrastructure, the better!

Love and Marriage

Category: Politics            Tuesday, June 6, 2006 at 2:49 pm

Silly me I always thought marriage was a union between two
people who loved each other and wanted to spend their lives together.
Apparently so does Answers.com:

    1. The legal union of a
      man and woman as husband and wife.
    2. The state of being married;
      wedlock.
    3. A common-law
      marriage.
    4. A union between two
      persons having the customary but usually not the legal force of marriage:
      a same-sex marriage

But apparently, according to the republicans, marriage is all
about a man and a woman coming together to make babies and raise their family. According to her, the judges in Mass.
who allowed gay marriage, didn’t just open marriage to another group of
(deserving) people, but instead called her values of marriage as a baby making
act into question and thus are calling her a bigot! Does that make any sense? If so I guess my
marriage is completely unsuccessful!!

Interesting Quotes for
G.W.’s speech yesterday:

“In recent months, however, some
activist judges and local officials have made an aggressive attempt to redefine
marriage.”

“America
is a free society, which limits the role of government in the lives of our citizens.
This commitment of freedom, however, does not require the redefinition of one
of our most basic social institutions. Our government should respect every
person, and protect the institution of marriage. There is no contradiction
between these responsibilities. We should also conduct this difficult debate in
a manner worthy of our country, without bitterness or
anger.”

Contradictory?

« Previous PageNext Page »